..
..
ILS
Basics
NDB and VOR
approaches, with their lateral guidance to
the runway, greatly improve the reliability of
flight schedules. But without the capability to
provide vertical guidance to the runway they are
limited in utility. No vertical guidance classes
them as non-precision approaches.
The
Instrument Landing System adds glide-slope, or
elevation information. Commonly called the ILS,
it is the mother of them all when it comes to
getting down close to the ground. In every sense
it is a precision approach system and with modern
equipment it can guide you right down to the
runwayzero Decision-Height and zero
visibility.
When you fly
the ILS, you're following the co-location of two
signals: a localizer for lateral guidance (VHF);
and a glide slope for vertical guidance (UHF).
When you tune your Nav. receiver to a localizer
frequency a second receiver, the glide-slope
receiver, is automatically tuned to its proper
frequency. The pairing is automatic.
There's more
to an ILS than the localizer and glide slope
signals. The FAA categorizes the components this
way:
Three-dimensional depiction of the Instrument
Landing System. Early VOR indicators had the
yellow and blue-colored arc as shown here, but it
was later phased out because it provided no
useful information. Localizer antennas shown at
far end of runway.
The localizer
signal provides azimuth, or lateral, information
to guide the aircraft to the centerline of the
runway. It is similar to a VOR signal except that
it provides radial information for only a single
course; the runway heading. Localizer information
is displayed on the same indicator as your VOR
information.
When tracking
the localizer the pilot turns towards the needle
in the same manner as with VOR navigation.
The localizer indicator reacts differently from a
VOR in several ways.
The localizer consists of
only a single course.
The localizer course
needle is sensitive as a VOR needle. Heading
adjustments four times as must be much
sensitivity of the indicator. For VOR work, each
smaller because of the increased dot under the
needle represents 2° deviation from course while
for the localizer each dot under the needle
represents 0.5° deviation from course.
Because the localizer
provides information for only one radial, the
runway heading, the Nav. receiver automatically
cuts out the OBS, the Omni Bearing Selector knob.
Rotating the OBS still rotates the course ring on
the instrument, but has no affect on the needle.
How sensitive
is the Localizer? Near the Outer Marker, a
one-dot deviation puts you about 500 ft.
from the centerline. Near the Middle Marker, one
dot means you're off course by 150 ft.
The localizer antenna is
located at the far end of the runway.
The approach course of
the localizer is called the front course.
The course line in the
opposite direction to the front course is called
the back course.
The localizer signal is
normally usable 18 NM from the field.
The Morse code
Identification of the localizer consists of a
three-letter identifier preceded by the letter I.
Here is the localizer identifier for Providence's
Runway 5R.
The Glide Slope
The Glide
Slope is the signal that provides vertical
guidance to the aircraft during the ILS approach.
The standard glide-slope path is 3° downhill to
the end of the runway. Follow it faithfully and
your altitude will be precisely correct when you
reach the touchdown zone of the runway.
Tracking the
glide slope is identical to tracking a localizer.
If the glide-slope needle swings away from
centerup or downmaneuver the aircraft
towards the needle by adjusting the engine's
power. Don't point the aircraft's nose up or
down.

The glide
path projection angle is normally adjusted to 3
degrees above horizontal so that it intersects
the MM at about 200 feet and the OM at about
1,400 feet above the runway elevation. The glide
slope is normally usable to a distance of
10 NM.
Marker
beacons are used to alert the pilot that an
action (e.g., altitude check) is needed. This
information is presented to the pilot by audio
and visual cues. The ILS may contain three marker
beacons: inner, middle and outer. The inner
marker is used only for Category II operations.
The marker beacons are located at specified
intervals along the ILS approach and are
identified by discrete audio and visual
characteristics (see the table below). All marker
beacons operate on a frequency of 75 MHz.
Notice above that the sound gets
"quicker" and the tone
"higher" as the aircraft moves towards
the airportfirst dashes, then dots and
dashes, finally just dots.
The
OM, 4 to 7 NM from the runway threshold, normally
indicates where an aircraft intercepts the glide
path when at the published altitude.
The MM, 3500
feet from the runway threshold, is the Decision
Height point for a normal ILS approach. On glide
path at the MM an aircraft will be approximately
200 feet above the runway.
The IM. 1000
feet from the runway threshold, is the Decision
Height point for a Category II approach. See
later for description of categories of ILS
approaches.
BC ... Most,
but not all, airports with an ILS also offer
guidance on the back course. The BC marker
identifies the FAF for the back course. A
Back-Course approach is non-precision since there
is no glide path associated with it.
The majority
of problems in locating marker beacons are the
availability of real estate and access to
utilities.
The ILS
brings in a brand new term, Decision Height, or
DH as you will always hear it from here on. Thus
far, the altitude published in the minimums
section of the approach plates that you have used
has been the MDA, or Minimum Descent Altitude.
When flying a non-precision approach, you are not
authorized to descend below the MDA unless you
can see the runway and make a normal landing.
DH has a
similar meaning. The DH for an ILS approach is a
point on the glide slope determined by the
altimeter where a decision must be made to
either continue the landing or execute a missed
approach. That's pretty simple.
Consider the
minimums, below, for Runway 5R at Green airport
in Providence, R.I.
Note: For this example,
the military minimums data has been omitted.
Here is the
interpretation of the minimums data from the
table above, for any Category A or B aircraft,
i.e., 1.3 × Stall Speed equals or is
less than 120 kts.
- The
minimums for a straight-in ILS approach
to runway 5R are 253 ft. DH and
1800 ft. RVR. As you descend down
the glide slope, when your altimeter
reads 253 ft., you must make a
decision whether to continue the descent
and approach, or to execute a missed
approach.
- If the
Glide Slope is unavailable for whatever
reason, one could fly a Localizer
approach straight in to Runway 5R.
In that case, with no glide slope, the
approach is no longer a precision
approach because no vertical guidance
information is being provided. The
720 ft. on the chart is now the MDA,
not the DH, and the minimum RVR has
increased to 2400 ft. Here, like the
VOR and NDB approaches that you have
already flown, you may descend to the MDA
as soon as you pass the FAF.
- The
circling approach, of course, is also a
non-precision approach. Its MDA is
720 ft and the minimum visibility is
one mile. Notice that RVR is not used
here. RVR is strictly for visibility down
a runway. In a circling approach, the
pilot's concern is his or her ability to
keep the airport in sight while
maneuvering for a runway which differs
from the approach course.
Many airline
carriers require Category D minimums for
a circling approach even if the aircraft
falls in the Category A or B range.
The circling approach is difficult and
raising the minimums relieves some of the
stress.
Sad
to say that there are air carrier pilots
who refuse to accept anything other than
an ILS approach due to their lack of
experience with the other procedures.
They would prefer to encounter a runway
with unfavorable winds. Nor do they trust
their "black boxes" without any
experience with them on alternate
approaches.
For the
longest time, the minimums for an ILS approach
were one-half mile visibility and a 200 ft.
ceiling. Then things began to change, principally
the reliability, accuracy, and capability of the
autopilot. RVR, a more reliable measurement of
visibility, began to appear on approach plates,
too.
As these
changes evolved, the FAA designated three
categories of ILS approaches, with successively
lower minimums. Later, they decided that three
categories didn't fit all of the desired
situations and further expanded it. The next
table shows the full range of ILS approaches.
Data from Aeronautical
Information Manual, AIM.
Note: Cat. IIIc approach is a
zero-zero approach.
The autopilot
is in full control of the aircraft for any
approach below Cat. I. And you can't initiate a
Cat. II or Cat. III approach at just any airport
simply because the weather minimums require it.
Those approaches, like all the others, must be
approved and published.
* Touchdown zone
identification lights and runway centerline
lights are available.
The
"LOC" approach is a Localizer approach
which utilizes only the localizer component of an
ILS. It is thus a non-precision approach with
higher minimums. Localizer approaches are the
first subject covered in the next chapter.
Airline captains use
RMI's more frequently than you think, even if
seldom for an NDB approach.
It has become
increasingly common to collocate a compass
locator transmitter with the Outer Marker beacon.
Some airports also have them with the Middle
Marker and Inner Marker beacons, too. These LF
NDBs serve the dual function of keeping pilots
appraised of their position relative to the
marker beacons and also can be navigation aids in
their own right.
Compass-locator
NDBs usually have a power of less than
25 watts, with a range of at least 15 miles
and operate between 190 and 535 KHz. At some
locations, higher powered radio beacons, up to
400 watts, are used as OM compass locators. These
generally carry Transcribed Weather Broadcast
information (TWEB).
Compass
locators transmit two-letter identification
groups. The outer locator transmits the first two
letters of the localizer ident Morse code, and
the middle locator transmits the last two letters
of the localizer ident code. In both cases, the
ident begins with the letter "I." For
example, at Providence, Runway 5R:
Localizer
Ident: I-PVD
OM
Ident: I-PV
MM
Ident: I-VD

Across the
top is distance in NM (5.1), ground speed
in kts (80) and the time to station in minutes
(4). This model lets you select which VOR the DME
is measuring distance fromthe one tuned
with Nav receiver #1 (N1) as in this case, or Nav
receiver #2 (N2).
The DME is slant
range, not distance along the ground. The
aircraft is in the air and the distance measured
is from up there to the station. So you'll always
be somewhat closer to the station than indicated
by the DME.
The error is
greater for short distances than large distances.
For example, if you were cruising at
5000 ft. and the DME indicated 5.1 NM as in
the illustration, your ground distance to the
station is about 4.9 NM, a 3% error. If your DME
reports 30 miles, still at 5000 ft, ground
distance now is 70 ft shorter than the slant
range, an insignificant error.
Distance
Measuring Equipment can be a crucial part of an
ILS installation. Not only does it assist with
the approach, but it can be a necessary component
to guide you to the FAF to begin the approach.
You'll get a chance to do some DME work in the
final section of the ILS approaches.
Functions of
the DME in an approach:
- When
installed with the ILS and specified in
the approach procedure, DME may be used:
- In
lieu of the OM,
- As
a back course (BC) final approach
fix (FAF), and
- To
establish other fixes on the
localizer course.
- In some
cases, DME from a separate facility may
be used:
- To
provide initial approach
segments,
- As
a FAF for BC approaches, and
- As
a substitute for the OM.
|